BC Fan Resources

Wednesday, April 11, 2018

Landry talks Draft


21 comments:

  1. UNFORTUNATELY the people minus Di FLOPPO responsible for men's disaster (Firing Al Skinner)
    women's (firing Cathy Inglese ) are still in charge. Getting rid of O'Bie and Dazzle Not
    in football a nightmare of disasters due to anti-athlectics.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Everything this kid does/says is calculated.

    Play football or don't play football.

    ReplyDelete
  4. What?

    Dude is a legit talent. Can’t wait to see him succeed in the NFL. Would love him at 26.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Didn't say he wouldn't be successful. Said everything he does is calculated.

    ReplyDelete
  6. of course its calculated, he is trying to get drafted, its a grueling four month job interview. he has to be calculated.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Injury doesn't make him any less a talent. Teams believe that he is damaged goods. They buy and validly off the front of the shelf. That is why Landry did not play in the bowl game. He is just a commodity on the open market just like at the grocery store. He has represented BC with class so everyone should wish him well.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I don’t understand the animosity toward Landry. He was a four star that chose us over Clemson and other top programs. He then came back after leading the nation in sacks.

    ReplyDelete
  9. So you agree he isn't a sincere person.

    He came back because the wife told him to come back. Probably told him not to play last year as well. Playing injured could lead to more injury and that would reduce your earning potential.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Like I said before, he will trend out to an annual 10-12 sacks, a dozen tackles and get run at every single play he is in the game for 3-4 years(if that). Any left tackle in the NFL could swat him away like a fly. If you don't have the fortitude to play college football with an ankle injury then your ankle is decimated and you shouldn't be drafted or you are kind of wimp.

    ReplyDelete
  11. U are literally an idiot.

    ReplyDelete
  12. He is 2-3 lbs heavier than Von Miller. He is bigger than Vic Beasley by 10 lbs. If he “trends out” to 10-12 sacks then he will be an All-Pro. Holt shit. My kingdom for a 10 sack guy. Again, do u actually watch any football or do u just post stupid shit on message boards. And, it’s conniver, by the way. I deserve two “n’s.”

    ReplyDelete
  13. And u deserve “holy.” As in, please post less dumb shit, holy toledo?

    ReplyDelete
  14. Sacks are an overrated statistic. Especially when you cannot set an edge, cover down field or tackle without twisting your ankle and missing a full season.

    ReplyDelete
  15. I don't care about Von Miller he is an outside LB with a massive DL in front of him. This kid is a pass rushing specialist if his ankle isn't bothering him.

    CT you have the same mentality as the kid, holier than thou prima Donna. Look up if I spelled it correctly, bitch.

    ReplyDelete
  16. CT,
    The best and all the losers on here do the same thing, you are the king of them though. They critique spelling or some other trivial aspect of a post and then they write something like you did, "U are literally an idiot."

    Douchebag, CT. D O U C H E B A G.

    ReplyDelete
  17. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  18. U did it several times too. Why don't you just post one of those animated pictures with a frowny face but put it upside down, sad motherfucker

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.