Thursday, September 17, 2009

Does ESPNBoston mean more BC coverage? and other links

Below is ESPN Boston's preview of the Clemson game. Nothing all that interesting but I appreciate the unique content. ESPN Boston is clearly going to focus on the Sox and Pats. I hope when they do cover BC, it is more than stuff from the BC beat. We have that covered with the Globe/Herald/HD's coverage. Give us more video ESPN Boston or at least interview some of the lessor know players.


The Globe updated the QB situation and nothing is new. We still have two QBs.


The field hockey team has a huge game this Saturday against Maryland. Both teams are in the top 10.

6 comments:

Big Jack Krack said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Big Jack Krack said...

Does anyone have information about Scafe's status for Clemson?

"The bigger uncertainty will be on defense. Junior Damik Scafe, the Eagles’ best interior lineman, did not practice yesterday with an undisclosed injury. Sophomore Kaleb Ramsey took his spot. . . ."

Big Jack Krack said...

Weather is a little more iffy for the game - Cloudy with showers and thunderstorms.. Highs in the upper 70s and lows in the upper 60s.

mod10aeagle said...

Is Herbstreit (sp?) aware that BC went to the ACC Championship game the last two seasons? He seems to have us confused with Holy Cross.

Perhaps wet weather will help slow down Ford and Spiller.

I think Spaz needs to pick a starter now. It doesn't take much imagination to envision both QBs struggling to get a rhythm against stiffer competition while rotating ever couple of possessions (let alone only having half the reps against the faux-Clemson practice squad during the week).

Unknown said...

I imagine he will pick a starter now. They probably already know who is starting. No reason to tell Clem-son, though.

mod10aeagle said...

Is that the Scandinavian version of Clemson, as in "son of Clem"?

I don't see any downside in letting Clemson know which QB will be starting. They just aren't different enough, nor do they run different offenses that migh warrant different defensive preparation. On the other hand, I think there's a significant downside to limiting the number of reps with the first team O against the practice squad that's running Clemson's D.