Thursday, September 13, 2012

BC-Northwestern preview

Last year's game against Northwestern was very telling. BC did enough to win, but a few bad plays, questionable clock and game management, and the inability to stop a scrambling quarterback cost us the game. All the issues became recurring problems throughout the season. Some of those problems still exist, but I feel like we have enough new elements to mask those issues. But because it is a non-conference road game, I feel like Saturday will once again be an indicator of how we will handle the rest of our schedule.

Hot Seat Thermometer
One week can make a difference. BC won easily and Notre Dame joined the ACC. What's there to worry about, right? In a way this game is all house money for Spaz. As the underdog, lame duck on the road, few expect us to win. Yet if he does win or even comes close, there will be those who say "look how hard this team is playing for Spaz!"
Temperature: It's still warm, but the winds coming off Lake Michigan makes things feel better

Overlooked storyline: the return of the Illinois crew
Only our recruiting focus has reverted back to Ohio this year, prior to that we really started making inroads at the Catholic programs in the Chicago area. This game will be a homecoming of sorts for Cleary, Clancy and Sinkovec and a few others.

Three Simple Keys
1. Shutting down their WRs. Usually our DBs are outclassed by the other team's skill guys. Not this week. We can contain their WRs. We can't let them get extra yards and cannot let them make big plays.
2. Establish the pass first. You can talk me into a vanilla approach against Maine, but not against Northwestern. Let's come out passing first and then, when we have the lead, start killing clock with the run.
3. Attack downfield. Syracuse and Vanderbilt both challenged NU and had success. We should press them deep too.

Gambling Notes
-- BC is 10-30-1 all time against Big Ten teams
-- Spaz is 7-9 on the road
-- Pat Fitzgerald is 6-6 vs BCS teams
The current line is BC+3.5

Factoid
The last time BC lost in Evanston (1993), the followed the loss by winning their next eight games.

Scoreboard Watching
Wake Forest-Florida State has the most relevancy to our season. We face both and this game will be a test of which team is for real. Not much was expected of the Deacons, but they already won a conference game. Florida State is expected to be a national power, yet hasn't played anyone yet. We'll know a lot more about both after the game.

I hope to see...
BC get to Colter and/or Siemian. In last year's game, there was nothing more frustrating than watching Colter nearly get tackled only to escape and turn a negative play into a big gain.

BC is in trouble if...
we kick field goals instead of scoring touchdowns. Earlier in the week I touched on our redzone issues. Northwestern can put up points on anyone, so for us to keep pace and win we need to get 7s instead of 3s!

Bottom Line
There are a millions reasons to doubt BC this weekend, but I am rolling with my hunch. I watched a portion of Northwestern's Syracuse game and didn't come away feeling the Cats were all that good. I think we trade scores with them for the first half, build a little bit of a lead in the second half and then hold off their rally late.
Final Score: BC 35, Northwestern 31

Labels: ,

7 Comments:

At 6:45 PM, Blogger Owen Kehoe said...

I like the high scorin prediction atl. But to add the turnovers and special teams are the key. Northwestern has an awesome kick return game and bc special teams defense was brutal against miami. Bc needs to win field possession game to win. Also finch must hold into the ball. - turnover differential will result in a loss. Also Any news on larmind, sinkovec, or Williams?

 
At 9:59 PM, Blogger mod34b said...

I have a feeling that our under appreciated DBs just might surprise on Saturday.

 
At 11:01 PM, Blogger eagleboston said...

How come no one is talking about the bullshit double penalty that BC received last year? An illegal procedure penalty took 10 seconds off the play clock in addition to the 5 yards in the final minute last year. I never saw that occur in any other game except for the BC-Northwestern game. Is that double penalty still in existence? We need to give Northwestern some serious payback for that BS call.

 
At 11:56 PM, Blogger jay said...

One thing, ATL. Key Point #1. Doesn't NW have some transfer from USC who was a ridiculous WR recruit? I have to imagine that any WR that got recruited by USC can outclass our DBs.

 
At 9:06 AM, Blogger Joseph said...

how can we get payback from NW for a bad call by officials? Are you implying that NW made the call by fixing the refs? Payback, indeed.

Win the game because you are dedicated and play smart and hard. Forget the nonsense.

 
At 11:42 AM, Blogger eagle1331 said...

My primary hope to see this game is no turnovers from our team and our Defense making some big plays...

 
At 5:25 PM, Blogger JBQ said...

This game and Clemson will be the "sweepstakes" involving Spaz. Lose both and then the new AD is on board. He could be gone by early October. Sadly, I hope so. I believe that that would stimulate the team into playing well the rest of the year.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home