Games I watched
BC-Miami 100%
Arizona State-USC 25%
Hawaii-Boise State 25%
LSU-Arkansas 50%
Mizzou-Kansas 50%
Georgia-Georgia Tech 50%
Rank | Team | Delta |
---|---|---|
1 | Missouri | 2 |
2 | Ohio State | 3 |
3 | Kansas | 2 |
4 | West Virginia | 2 |
5 | Hawaii | 5 |
6 | Georgia | 3 |
7 | Southern Cal | 7 |
8 | LSU | 6 |
9 | Oklahoma | 3 |
10 | Boston College | 1 |
11 | Arizona State | 7 |
12 | Virginia Tech | 5 |
13 | Brigham Young | 9 |
14 | Florida | 6 |
15 | Illinois | 3 |
16 | Tennessee | 7 |
17 | Clemson | 4 |
18 | Texas | 3 |
19 | Virginia | 11 |
20 | Auburn | 6 |
21 | Wisconsin | 2 |
22 | Oregon | 9 |
23 | Cincinnati | 1 |
24 | Wake Forest | 2 |
25 | Air Force | -- |
Dropped Out: Boise State (#16), Connecticut (#17).
9 comments:
ACCCG storyline that won't be talked about: the two best teams in the ACC this year weren't even in the conference 4 years ago.
Ga Tech to fire Gailey. Not sure if they would pursue Logan, but not good news.
http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=3127998
"This sport needs a playoff." Couldn't agree more. If Oklahoma knocks off Mizzou, we will have a National Championship game with two teams who didn't have to play a conference championship game. WVU-Ohio State. Lame. Lame. Lame.
Also, looks like ESPN gameday going to Big XII championship game over ours.
Even though I am all for a playoff, for all intents and purposes both WVU and Ohio State played the equivalent of a conference championship game with their last games being against division leading foes UConn and Michigan respectively, albeit a home game (and ignoring the Pitt game for WVU).
WVU and Ohio State playing the equivalent of conference championships for the final game of the season is ONLY a byproduct of their schedule this year. To reward two teams with a shot at the national title that didn't have to play a conference championship seems a little crazy to me.
I don't think its far-fetched to think that an Illinois/Michigan couldn't beat Ohio State on a neutral field to win the Big 10 in a championship game. The Big East is another matter, since I think the conference is pretty weak this year and WVU is clearly the best team.
To put this in perspective, VTech would have already won the ACC w/o an ACC CG even though we finished second and we beat them.
Every conference needs a championship game to level the playing field in my opinion. Then take the 6 BCS conference winners and 2 at-larges and have an 8 game playoff.
how does VT move down 5 spots after a convincing win over a ranked uva team? weird.
How many teams would have the exact same record as ohio state or wvu if they played the exact same schedule. My guess at least a half dozen.
I actually agree with Bill re: VTech. I think we are the better team going into this game. Hence BC at 10 and VTech at 12. Granted, I am biased and no one in the media seems to think the same as I do.
I think Kansas is a little high at 3 though. The only team they have played with a >.500 winning pct and they lose.
Brian: "Every conference needs a championship game to level the playing field in my opinion. Then take the 6 BCS conference winners and 2 at-larges and have an 8 game playoff."
Except then, out of conference schedules mean absolutely nothing...
"Except then, out of conference schedules mean absolutely nothing..."
I disagree. At a minimum, out of conference records would count towards:
1) determining the 2 at-large births from the BCS standings (combination of record, SOS, and polls/rankings) and
2) seeding the 8 tournament teams
Plus, there will always be additional bowls for the rest of the ~64 other teams that are postseason eligible. So overall resume would count then as well.
This isn't so far off from how it is today.
Post a Comment