(Because it is so early in the season I am still rewarding teams with perfect records.)
Games I watched
UNC-Rutgers 50%
Kansas-South Florida 50%
NC State-Clemson 50%
Cal-Maryland 50%
Michigan-Notre Dame 33%
South Carolina-UGA 33%
Georgia Tech-Virginia Tech 33%
Oregon-Purdue 10%
Ohio State-USC 50%
Auburn-Mississippi State 25%
Rank | Team | Delta |
---|---|---|
1 | Southern Cal | 1 |
2 | Georgia | 1 |
3 | Florida | -- |
4 | Oklahoma | -- |
5 | Missouri | -- |
6 | East Carolina | -- |
7 | Texas Tech | 2 |
8 | Wake Forest | 2 |
9 | LSU | 2 |
10 | Alabama | 2 |
11 | Oregon | 2 |
12 | South Florida | 4 |
13 | Texas | 2 |
14 | Auburn | -- |
15 | Penn State | 4 |
16 | Wisconsin | 4 |
17 | Utah | 6 |
18 | North Carolina | 8 |
19 | Brigham Young | 7 |
20 | Florida State | 5 |
21 | Oklahoma State | 5 |
22 | Nebraska | 4 |
23 | TCU | 3 |
24 | Ball State | 2 |
25 | Iowa | 1 |
Dropped Out: Ohio State (#7), Kansas (#8), California (#17), Fresno State (#18), Arizona State (#21), Georgia Tech (#22), UCLA (#24).
5 comments:
Does one loss really warrant a complete drop out of the Top 25 for Kansas and Ohio State? This seems a bit extreme to me.
Yeah, Kansas looked as good as USF on the Bulls homefield, which, if anything, ought to warrant keeping them where they are. Kansas is clearly better than the teams listed 19-25 and much better than Nebraska, who has brought in three of the worst teams in the country to build false momentum for VATech.
No offense, but being at home with your own children is not called baby-sitting, it's called parenting. I'm just saying...
I'm pretty sure USC could beat the Kansas City Chiefs and the St. Louis Rams.
Let me get this straight, you have Iowa ranked ahead of Ohio State. Huh?
Post a Comment