Sunday, September 21, 2008

Second viewing thoughts and grade report: Central Florida

We won 34-7. With consistent QB play we would have won 56-0. I feel that strongly. UCF is a decent Conference USA team. But we were better in every area. Their highly-touted secondary -- pfft...ours is better. In fact I think we might be better at every position than we were last year with one exception. (Guess which one?). That said, watching this game back these are the few things I picked up.

Offense: B-

The offensive line played very well. They had push on nearly every play. The pass protection was very good. Tennant and Ramsey continued their solid play. They controlled their men and really didn’t make any obvious mistakes. Lapham played well. Getting nick picky, but Claiborne and Castonzo both had a few lapses. Castonzo got sucked in on helping Ramsey pass block and didn’t release on a delayed blitz to his side. Rossi spelled Claiborne a bit and looked good too. Although it wasn’t text book, the line play showed how the zone should work. We dominate up front, get space and push off the line and a back like Harris finds the soft spots.

Last year the Wide Receivers had the best QB in the country and proceeded to drops tons of catchable balls. This year things are a little more scatter shot and now the guys have hands of glue. Momah’s two drops were the only real mental errors. Everything else they held on to or couldn’t get to. Momah may have had a dropped those two, but he also made some nice plays, including coming back and catching Crane’s deep ball. Gunnell made some nice plays. Purvis remains a steady hand (I wish we could get him more touches). Anderson’s catch was in garbage time. Jarvis is also maturing. The big day belonged to Robinson. He made a bunch of tough catches in traffic and took some big hits. His TD was a beauty. He out fought two guys and then turned on jets I didn’t know he had. He's always been dependable, but never shown that sort of breakaway speed. Let's hope he can do that in ACC play.

Too often we assume that a good running game is all about a star back or just great offensive line. Reality is not that simple. For example, Jeff Smith was running behind the same line and getting a similar push as Montel Harris. But Harris showed that balance, burst, patience and vision are all part of the package. In addition to his more fluid and natural running, Harris also showed good hands and instincts in the passing game. McCluskey continues to be a nice change of pace and pounder, although he didn’t find any big holes this week.

For his first snaps, Dominique Davis played well. His throws over the middle were better and delivered with more authority than Crane’s. On the out routes and deep balls, his delivery wasn’t as sharp. He threw the passes effortlessly, but they lack velocity. Both his deep throws were slow and forced his targets to cut back and come back to the ball. He ran well. His two big mistakes -- which didn’t really cost us -- were his inability to anticipate and escape a delayed blitz and his passes that could a have been picked up. He is not a miracle player who will save the season, but his poise and aggressiveness certainly changed the feel of the offense. Perhaps his success allowed Crane and Logan to open it up. I certainly am glad he played and hope he gets even more time against URI. No savior, but he is an alternative.

Chris Crane told his teammates that the first half Chris Crane is gone. Was I the only one who didn’t love the second half Chris Crane all the much either? He turned the ball over three times, but there were six other passes that could’ve and should’ve been picked off. Many of Crane's decisions were poor and many of his passes were off target. He still had a breakdown with Momah during one of the redzone drives. This game could have been a total disaster. That said, there was some improvement and signs of life. We haven’t turned a corner, but saw a glimpse that there may be a corner way way down the road. The good things: he ran well and may start to realize that running is better than forcing something downfield that isn’t there. In between his terrible throws and his horrible offbalance throws, there were some good ones. Don’t let the postgame spin fool you. This was another bad performance. Things are not hopeless, but Crane is not good. He will cost us games in the future.

As a Steve Logan apologist let me start with the two areas that had me screaming in anger. The first was our first foray into the redzone. He knows what Crane can and cannot do at this point, so why is he giving him plays dependent upon sharp passes. Give Crane some rollout options that he can run on. The second time where I thought our resident genius outsmarted himself was when we were pinned on the one yard line. Two weeks ago in a similar position Crane took a horrible safety. I know Logan is not conservative, but in that area we should have run it three straight times and punted. Instead we throw?!? Of course it ended up in a INT. Those gripes aside I was happy with the play calling. We showed fewer looks but got the ball into a variety of receivers. I thought Davis’ package was well balanced. The best part was Logan and Jags concluding at halftime that Chris Crane is not a “game manager.” They know what they have and decided to open things up and take the good with the bad. This will certainly scare us going forward, but hopefully we’ll get enough big plays to offset that.

Defense: A

Raji played well again. He is really setting the tone for the rest of the D. Brace was limited in snaps, but picked up his play in the second half. Scafe had his best game of the year. He was partnered with Raji often and was up for the challenge. On the goal line stand, Scafe got really low and busted up their interior. Ramella had a solid game. Giles was active. Newman looked good. If he just improves his quickness and/or ability to disengage his blocker, he’ll be closing in on some sacks soon. True Freshman Kaleb Ramsey got on the field for the first extended time and played well. Willette made a few plays.

While the DLine rotated frequently, the Linebackers continue to have a shorter rotation. Toal looks fully healthy and was very active. He definitely anticipated where to be and made play after play. McLaughlin didn’t get attention, but he also had a great great game. Solid tackling throughout. Herzy played well. Francois played well. Akins had a few miscues, but overall played well and in two positions. Thompson made a play in special teams.

The defensive backs all played well. The maligned Anderson looked very good in run support. He also added an INT. Fletcher continues to play beyond his years. He also showed a willingness to mix it up in stopping the run. Davis is also very aggressive. Rollins had many positive plays including his pick. It was a great example of reading the QB and then closing quickly. Johnson got on the field, but didn’t make a big play.

No complaints about Spaz so far. In fact, I liked his second half adjustments. In the first half we went primarily base. In the second half we showed a variety of looks and got more aggressive. I also think Spaz and Siravo deserve some kudos for how well the defensive backs have played so far. Our anticipated weakness has looked very good early in the season.

Special Teams: B-

The one kick off return was a thing of beauty. Smith used his blockers and then exploded. Hopefully there is more to come from him.

The first two punts were good with decent punt coverage. The last two were pure shanks. I am hoping it was just freshmen jitters.

The kickoffs were a mixed bag. Bennett got most deep. He skulled a few others (the announcers attributed it to the wind?). What concerned me more was the kick off coverage. We did not get nearly enough pressure on the return men. I don’t know if Bennett’s kicks need more air or if we don’t have the right guys on the kick team, but it wasn’t good.

Steve Aponavicius bounced one off the uprights. On the others he was fine. I think we just have to take it for what it is.

Overall: B+

In my quick recap, I said the score was misleading. This grade is misleading too. A few more Crane mistakes and this could have been a loss. I think this is a very good team with an Achilles Heel. So the grade shows that the team is good but not great.

24 comments:

blockparty said...

Chris Crane told his teammates that the first half Chris Crane is gone. Was I the only one who didn’t love the second half Chris Crane all the much either?


Thank you for pointing this out. He threw for 200 yards and had 3 ints, 2 in the second half. It will continue throughout the season, and it will leave our D in a big time hole.

Phil said...

Crane really just needs to look around more.

There were a ton of plays where he was just locked in on one receiver the whole time, and if that guy was covered, it was either a sack or an interception.

The play calling in the first goal line situation was insane, the only 2 options that close should be bootlegs or handoffs to Toal, don't even bother throwing it.

I did like one time when it was 3 and 10 from around UCF's 40 and they called a draw, fulling planning on going for it on 4th down. Neither kicker has the leg to go deep, and the punter was having issues, so between the 50 and their 30 should be 4 down territory no matter what, and the play call for 3rd down should reflect that.

Walter said...

I will never completely dismiss Aponavicius because he won us our bowl game two years ago and was an amazing boost of energy and a great storyline, but, I am flabbergasted as to why we don't have another more consistent kicker by now.

Missing that field goal was inexcusable; didn't we lose last week in a game by three points when he was effectively iced on a kick that was definitely within his reach? There are no guarantees with him, I wish we had a viable backup.

BCHysteria said...

Was I the only one who didn’t love the second half Chris Crane all the much either?

I thought he stunk, I don't care if we won this game he looked terrible all game long and only won because the defense put him position to win. I was at the game and booed him hard (even though the person behind me asked me to stop), because even though he had some big plays I attribute them more to luck than anything. I still think this is going to be a long season, and BC is going to have to make some huge adjustments if they want to stand a chance in ACC play.

Ralph said...

As Phil pointed out earlier, Crane has this tendency to telegraph his passes. He will set his sights on his first read, wait for the receiver to make his break and then throw it. I have rarely seen him look off anyone, pump fake or simply go through his other options. I feel this is his biggest problem. When we start playing better, quicker, more athletic defenses (Virginia Tech & Clemson) he is going to be even more prone to an INT. I sure hope he learns this sooner rather then later.

Eagle1 said...

Hazel Mae's Landing Strip: Excellent screenname. Add the apostrophe before the "s," and you're perfect.

Re: Aponavicious, his time may be at an end. According to an article in today's Herald: "Jagodzinski said kicker Billy Bennett might get the call on field goals." Thank you, Sweet Jesus.

Re: Crane, I noted right after the GTech game that the guy locks on to a receiver with the determination of a mental patient. It reminds me of myself at Centerfolds. Makes one wonder what "fundamentals" he practiced with those two weeks off.

Re: boos, I don't understand the "don't boo" crowd, of which my wife is a card-carrying member. Crane was awful and deserved to hear it. He's getting a free ride at BC, has been around for five years, and is something like 24 years old. Some of his passes would be unacceptable in the Pee-Wee league. What are we supposed to do, hop the fence, hug him, and kiss him French style? Life is rough. Get used to it.

Trevor Lair said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
BCNorCal07 said...

I, too, do not understand the argument against booing. Sometimes it's tasteless and classless, but paying fans should be able to voice their opinions as long as they aren't vulgar or inappropriate. Would I have booed Crane on Saturday, had I been there? Honestly, I don't know. But in situations like this, it's not even the player that's being booed. It's the decision made by the coaches to keep playing him even as he struggles so mightily. I'm an SF Giants fan. We don't boo Barry Zito. We boo Brian Sabean for signing him, if that makes sense.

Having never been booed, I don't know how tough it might be to hear yourself being booed. However, I do know that I want what is best for this team, and the passing display we witnessed on Saturday is not it. It's a tough situation to be sure, and I do hope that Chris improves. If he does, this team could be great.

Laxman said...

I understand what you're saying about Logan, but at the same time Defensive Coordinators are smart guys too. You can't simply stop using one half of your playbook because you don't trust your QB. You can either run the offense or you can't. If you're suggestion is to never pass from deep in your own end because you think your QB is more likely to throw a pick you need a new QB, not a new playbook. Also, if I'm a DC I'm stacking the box and making you throw. Crane has to do better.

Munky said...

Re: Booing--It's within your rights but it's a dick move. You've seen how some professionals react to it (see Vince Young), and you want to boo a 21/22 year old who's put 4 years into the program and trying his hardest? Put yourself in his shoes.

bill said...

are you serious munky? you think people shouldn't be able to boo even pro athletes? vince young makes a lot of money, more than i'll ever make. with salaries being what they are, and the mindset of most pro athletes, sports are really only for entertainment purposes anymore. so if i don't like the performance, i am well within my right to boo as someone who paid to be entertained, and the entertainer can either improve or sit down.

you could make the case that college athletics aren't only about entertainment, but if there is one obvious weak link to a team, and it looks like the coaching staff is making a huge mistake by keeping him out there, then we have every right to boo and make our opinion heard. hey, if davis gets in there, and is no better than crane, and jags and company put crane back in, then i won't boo or call for others to boo because at least the staff tried to fix the problem (a problem that may not have a fix this season). but at this point, i think the collective sentiment is that davis *could* be better, and if that's the case, the staff is making a mistake by not exploring that possibility.

the only time an athlete shouldn't be booed in my opinion is if they've earned it. jordan, jeter, brady, matt ryan last year. take derek jeter as an example - he should never be booed, and it was a disgrace a couple seasons back when he was being booed by yankee fans during an 0 for 30 slump. but chris crane, all he's done is sat on the bench for 4 years, and received a very good degree for free (something i had to pay a lot of money for). he has not earned a free pass on the field in my opinion.

Munky said...

Bill--I think you misunderstood my post. I just used the Vince Young example to show how booing can really affecf someone's life. I didn't say that you should or shouldn't boo PRO athletes tho. Getting back to the topic of booing Crane tho...it's within your rights to boo high school students too, doesn't make it right.

Eagle in Brighton said...

I agree there are some untouchables (Jeter, Brady, Tim Duncan, etc.), but beyond that, if you are compensated for playing the game, all bets are off. Professionals? Sure. High School kids? No.

College athlets fall in the former catagory, as they are essentially making $50k+ a year and thus fair targets.

If anything, booing of Crane was only sporadic, and more in response to poor decision making (within his control) rather than lack of natural ability (beyond his control).

If you attend the game, you are fully in the right to voice your displeasure. Whether it is productive is another story entirely.

Eagle1 said...

Munky:

Simply booing is a "dick move?" Enough with the liberal touchy-feely sensitivity crap. As far as I know, each person on the field is big, strong, adult who possesses a pair of testicles and plays one of the most violent sports on the planet. I don't see any young girls operating a neighborhood lemonade stand out there.

Also, using Vince Young as an example of what boos can do is incredibly misleading. First of all, the guy is a mental midget to begin with. Remember him scoring 6 on the Wunderlich test? Look up "emotional intelligence." Maybe we all should stop drinking alcohol too because a small percentage of people can't handle the stuff. Please. Second, perhaps if Vince heard a few more boos during college (especially upon receiving his test scores) instead of getting his ass kissed 24/7 he'd be better able to handle adversity today.

Eagle1 said...

And another thing: I don't boo at the drop of a hat. You basically need to take a gigantic dump on the field for me to do it. Unfortunately, our QB and place kicker have soiled Alumni Stadium more than a few times this year.

Munky said...

First of all, there's a big difference between being on scholarship and being paid to play. Most amateur football players at the D-1 level get scholarships (so do exceptionally talents students in other areas). Pro football players sign contracts for millions. Amateur players go to class, live together on campus, and are truly part of a community for 4-5 years. Pro players hold out for bigger contracts, leave organizations for bigger money, get traded, etc. There's a big difference between a pro and an amateur, and there's a big difference between booing a pro and booing an amateur.

If the scholarship opens someone up for booing, does that mean walk-ons can't get booed? What about the hockey team? Do partial scholarship players get booed half as loud?

Munky said...

eagle1:

"As far as I know, each person on the field is big, strong, adult who possesses a pair of testicles and plays one of the most violent sports on the planet. I don't see any young girls operating a neighborhood lemonade stand out there."

As you point out later in your post, there's no correlation between "possessing a pair of testicles" and being emotionally mature, so it seems to be you contradict yourself in your post.

"perhaps if Vince heard a few more boos during college (especially upon receiving his test scores) instead of getting his ass kissed 24/7 he'd be better able to handle adversity today."

Why stop there. If he had been booed in High School he would've been better prepared to handle it in college.

So what exactly are your criteria that opens someone up to booing? They "need to take a gigantic dump on the field" seems to be one. Having testicles and playing football seems to be another. Emotional intelligence too. Sure, I'd argue most of our team meets those standards, but I'm also just as sure that some of the KIDS (18-22 years old) do not, and would take booing a lot harder than you realize. But hey, it's just a few students, so screw em if they don't like it, right?

So who cares how it affects the students on the field, the "BC guys," members of our community, so long as everyone on the field and everyone sitting around you knows that you're pissed off. Right?

Eagle in Brighton said...

Fair point, fair point.

Though the theory obviously isn't perfect or relatable accross all college sports, the principle remains the same: these are elite athlets playing the most prominent collegiate sport in the nation, one in which most recieve full rides (which is warrented). But with that stage, and for many, that priviledge, comes the accepted risk of verbal critism.

Personally, I'm of the belief booing is a mixed bag: for every athlete it motivates (ARod) and personel decision it influences, there are those that wilt under its pressure (VYoung).

In a sense, it is a litmus test for an athletes mental acuity.

Whether booing is productive (in any capacity) is debatable: but actual choice to boo is an unsavory, yet accepted part of the college football/basketball game in my book.

Eagle in Brighton said...

Obviously, booing poor performance is a gray area for fans (to which the tread can attest), but booing lack of effort is forever acceptable in my mind(happened several times with Manny at Fenway this year and had no qualms about joining in).

Munky said...

I agree. If there was ever an acceptable time to boo someone it was Manny's complete disregard for paying customers, his team mates, his huge contract, and tradition.

Eagle1 said...

Munky:

"So what exactly are your criteria that opens someone up to booing? They "need to take a gigantic dump on the field" seems to be one. Having testicles and playing football seems to be another. Emotional intelligence too. Sure, I'd argue most of our team meets those standards, but I'm also just as sure that some of the KIDS (18-22 years old) do not, and would take booing a lot harder than you realize. But hey, it's just a few students, so screw em if they don't like it, right?"

1. "Gigantic dump" = a funny way to say "extremely poor performance." Check. I probably let Crane do a half-dozen awful things against GTech before I opened my mouth.

2. "Having testicles." Check. I'm not into booing women. That's just how I roll.

3. "Playing football." No check. Booing has applications beyond football.

4. "Emotional intelligence." No check. I boo both the smart and the dumb.

5. "KIDS." No. The government says that 18 y/o constitutes an adult. There are a lot of "kids" fighting in Afghanistan and Iraq right now that are younger than our football players. I'm guessing that all of them wouldn't crumble from a boo here or there from their superior officers.

As Eagle in Brighton rightly says, one's ability to handle boos "is a litmus test for an athletes mental acuity." If football players can't take boos, perhaps they're not cut out for the sport. As an alternative, BC probably offer classes on finger-painting.

Munky said...

eagle1--

Then what is wrong with me using Vince Young as an example of how booing really affects the players? He's an adult with testicles who performed poorly.

The military has nothing to do with this. Guys fighting over seas who have gone through military training is not a fair comparison (and frankly irrelevant) to chris crane and other student athletes situations.

To me, booing is a very selfish act. As I posted before--Who cares how it affects the students on the field, the "BC guys," members of our community, so long as everyone on the field and everyone sitting around you knows that you're pissed off. Right? If they don't like it, they can quit.

Eagle in Brighton said...

Fair points Munky: I have to agree booing is a selfish act, but in terms of fan etiquite, I'm just not convinced it should be universally frowned upon.

Something should be said for unconditional support- but I think we are confusing support with positivity. Supporting your team through thick and thin is central to fandom, but occassional verbal frustration at incompetence does not negate this.

ATL_eagle said...

I have a booing post up now. Try to move the conversation regarding booing there. Also try to show respect towards other posters.