Tuesday, October 03, 2006

Fashion Police


Florida State recently announced they will wear a special all-black uniform for their game against BC. You can debate the merits of the Johnny Cash look, but I think the real story is their questionable opponent for such a change. It just doesn't make sense to me. You are wearing a new color scheme in a conference game that was very hard fought last year. Despite playing at a high level, there is an instictive adjustment that players have to make ("the guys in black are my teammmates"). And you take on this confusion/adjustment against the team in football with a uniform most similar to your own?
Which one is BC and which is Florida State?


This shouldn't decide the game, but one pass to the wrong guy or one hesitant tackle could make a difference. Shouldn't they have tried this stunt against Clemson or NC State or anyone but the team with a maroon and gold color scheme. BC should add arrows to our helmets for this one game just to complete the effect.


BTW, BC is 1-1 in special uniform games.

We beat Notre Dame in the Green Jersey game.


And we lost to Virginia Tech in their flojo shoulder Jersey game.

Monday, October 02, 2006

AOL update and other links

The AOL blogging will start to pick up too.


Here is a link from the NYT on how the expectations are rising in the ACC.


Coming in November: Doug Flutie Day.

Blogpoll ballot

I didn't fill a blogpoll ballot last week. The move and lack of football forced my hand. This week, I got to see a decent amount of games and got to the ballot in time. It is actually nice starting from scratch...I feel like I can place teams where I think they belong. Unlike other weeks where I sometime feel I have to back into my logic from the week before.

Games I watched
Maine-BC listened
UGA-Ole Miss 25%
Alabama-Florida 25%
GaTech-VaTech 75%
Auburn-South Carolina 25%


RankTeamDelta
1 Auburn 25
2 Ohio State 24
3 Southern Cal 23
4 Florida 22
5 Michigan 21
6 West Virginia 20
7 Louisiana State 19
8 Louisville 18
9 Texas 17
10 Georgia 16
11 Oregon 15
12 Tennessee 14
13 Notre Dame 13
14 Clemson 12
15 Florida State 11
16 Cal 10
17 Oklahoma 9
18 Georgia Tech 8
19 Virginia Tech 7
20 Texas Tech 6
21 Rutgers 5
22 Boston College 4
23 Missouri 3
24 Nebraska 2
25 Wake Forest 1

Dropped Out:

Weekend thoughts without grades

I didn’t see any of the game. The audio was good (I don’t have access to ESPN 360), but I don’t feel great about giving any grades. So this is what I thought.


Offense: N/A


Matt Ryan still seems a bit off. I know that a few of the passes were catchable, but you would expect a more crisp day against Maine. Especially with decent protection. Chris Crane played less than I hoped, and didn’t do much to distinguish himself, but didn’t hurt himself either.


The offensive line feedback was good. Good ground numbers and good protection are positive indicators (when you cannot actually see the game).


Callender had his best day of the season. He also broke a long run. The QBs also ran more than expected. Still very little use of Jeff Smith on offense. If you are not going to use him against Maine, when are you going to use him? Whitworth didn’t get the carries, but did catch a few balls for some quality yards.


Ryan didn’t light it up, but he did move the ball around…10 different guys caught passes. Still not much passing to the Tight Ends. After the CMU game, I thought they were going to be a real weapon. Once again shows what I know.



Defense: N/A


A shutout is a shutout. After looking haggard most of the season, the defense showed up, even if it was against a lesser opponent.


The defensive line controlled their area and really shut down Maine’s ground game.


Herzlich gained notice for his all around play. The younger guys on the depth chart are giving me hope that our defense won’t be bad forever.


Special Teams: N/A


No missed kicks. Only two punts. But another fumbled punt return. I thought Tribble had solid hands. Isn’t that why he, and not Jeff Smith, is back there? Very troublesome.


The special teams also deserve credit for the punt block/safety.


Overall: N/A


I am limited in what I can accurately say. It clearly was not the perfect game or make anyone forget the NC State game. But it was a win and a shut out. Two steps in the right direction.

Saturday, September 30, 2006

Quick AOL update

Here is a quick, mini-preview on AOL. I will be away from the PC today, so I am not sure when I'll have the post game thoughts. Sorry about this week. Monday will see a return to regular blogging.

Thursday, September 28, 2006

BC-Maine preview

Life interfering with blogging again. I spent most of my night in different airports on the East Coast. Sorry for the delay in the preview. Now onto Maine:


Theme that won’t be discussed on television radio. Maine’s giant killer potential will be discussed ad nauseum. BC needing to bounce back will also be a theme. What I don’t think you’ll hear on the official Eagles Radio Network is how despite the intention, these games don’t build interest in New England football. Let’s face it the Patriots’ success drove more kids to football programs than anything any of the colleges have done in the past 15 years. New England has some solid I-AA programs, but none of them particularly draw well or generate much coverage. If BC truly wanted to spark interest in regional football, they would resume a series with UConn. However, I can’t think of one person associated with BC who wants to play the Huskies in any sport.


Three Simple Keys.
1. Stop the big plays. The defensive stats have been somewhat misleading. Not every team has chipped away at us. We’ve had plenty of good series and stops. (For example limiting NC State on 3rd down conversions). But the team remains frustratingly vulnerable to big plays. Allowing them is dangerous. Allowing them against the Black Bears is twice as dangerous. Any encouragement and confidence Maine gets will make the game that much harder for us. This game could also serve as a chance to the defense to get its bearings.
2. Relentless offense. Going conservative against NC State allowed our rushing game to shine for the first time. However, it also kept the game close and allowed them to comeback. Don’t make this game interesting. Pass early and often and have 28 on the board by half.
3. Try a new kicker. This is the one game where it shouldn’t mean anything. Burn Flutie’s redshirt. Let the walk-ons try. Anything.


Gambling Notes
-- TOB is 21-14 off of a loss
-- Maine is 1-3 all-time against Division DIA opponents
-- BC hasn’t lost to a DIAA team since 1980
The game is not listed on the online gambling sites


What would be a pleasant surprise? An easy victory with Chris Crane getting all the snaps in the second half.


What would be a letdown? A win by anything less than 21. This team should be angry after last week and want to take it out on Maine.


What would be a shocker? A BC loss. And it would be real problems for TOB.

Bottom Line
This game should be fun. I think Maine will give it their all, but we’ll pull away. Let’s hope the team plays crisp. After last week they need to show what they are made of.
Final Score: BC 42, Maine 20

Wednesday, September 27, 2006

My annual NESN gripe

I almost went to the Maine game. Not because I have a burning desire to see us take on a DIAA team in person, but because it is not being televised. (I am also going to be in Westchester, New York for a wedding Friday. I wouldn’t have made the trip just for the Maine game. I am not that crazy.)


Now, plenty of schools don’t have all their games televised – especially against DIAA opponents. But how many schools have marketing agreements with companies that own regional sports networks? I would think that our relationship with the Red Sox and the Red Sox position at NESN, Fenway Sports Group could make this happen if they wanted.


NESN reaches homes in Maine. If the Red Sox wanted to build their partnership you’d think this would be a no brainer. Promote BC football. Promote regional sports. I know the costs are expensive but you can do it on the cheap and still get away with it. And if Gameplan picks it up, you recoup some of your costs before you sell a single ad.


So what is the New England Sports Network showing instead of Maine-BC?


NESN Schedule for Saturday, 9/30
1:00 PM On the Hook with David Sloan
1: 30 PM Divers Down (which is a rerun)
2:00 PM Northeast Journal (rerun)
2:30 PM Northeast Journal (rerun)
3:00 PM Northeast Journal (rerun)
3:30 PM Camo-country Television


Now I don’t have access to the ratings books in Boston, but I’d bet our game would out draw all of those quality episodes of Northeast Journal. Camo-Country is new broadcast and probably plays well in Maine, but I still think more people care about Black Bear football.


My advice: next time you see Gene ask him why NESN doesn’t come in and broadcast our home games not picked up by our national partners.


Displaced fans like me will just have to listen online.

Maine malaise

Sorry for the light posting this week. Saturday left a bitter taste in my mouth and I’ve also been feeling under the weather. Plus there is not much to report or comment on. This game is truly filler. The only way it will ever get discussed beyond this week is if Maine upsets us. If that happens -- look out. I think you would see the whole tone of the majority of fans change. BUT, I don’t expect us to lose this week.


Take a look at Maine’s last two games against DIA opponents. First their monumental upset of Mississippi State.


How did it happen? Maine played tough and caught a lot of breaks (box score | recap). First Mississippi State turned the ball over three times. The game really turned in the second quarter when the Black Bears stalled three Bulldog drives in Maine territory and the Bulldogs came away with no points. So down only 7-0 at the Half, they felt they had a chance. Maine’s punter also had a great day.


In Maine’s most recent game against DIA team, they gave Nebraska a scare.

How did it happen? Maine forced the Huskers into five turnovers (box score). That was the only thing that really kept the game close through three quarters (recap). Nebraska pulled away late.


I expect BC to win. I’ll have my preview Thursday.

Monday, September 25, 2006

Viewing thoughts and grade report: NC State

Who knew that moving would be the highlight of my weekend? This game really hurt. Not sure why as we’ve been beaten in this manner before. I think it was the tipping point for me. After keeping the tiniest sliver of hope that TOB had something special on his horizon, I am now convinced that he does not. For the remainder of his tenure we will win 8ish games and go to third rate bowls. And that just bores me.


I will keep blogging and certainly keep rooting, but I will not hold out hope for something more. It is just easier that way.


Now onto the grades. (Due to the move, I didn’t get a chance to watch the game twice.)


Offense: C-


The rough night started with Ryan. As I’ve been saying, he is having problems with the touch passes to the flats. He also threw an ugly floater on the INT. He seemed confused all night (running more than ever, throwing into traffic, etc). He even missed deep opportunities on his scrambles (which is unlike him). When he had time in the pocket and was throwing darts (like on the first TD drive) or when he was pumping to Challenger, he looked good. Everything else, not so much. I think the coaches need to look at this game film and start trying to tailor things to what he does well (pocket passing) and forget these touch passes and the friggin’ option.


We wasted the best performance of the season from the running backs. Both LV and AC played really well. They hit their holes, read their blocks and ran with more authority than I’ve seen all year. Unfortunately neither is a game breaker. Both had moments where they were one move away from breaking a long one but couldn’t take advantage. They just don’t have that raw speed or allusiveness to breakaway.


The receivers -- not much to talk about here. We only complete 13 passes and four of those were to the backs. Robinson looked quick until he was knocked out. He did run short of first down marker on a crucial 3rd down, but he’ll learn. Challenger and Ryan are clearly in tune with one another. Gonzo’s TD was very pretty. I think the problem with this game and with these two as our leads, is that neither is big or fast enough to cause mismatch problems against a team like NC State. Ryan was flustered by the coverage and hence, fewer passes and less guys involved. I don’t know why we haven’t gone to the Tight Ends more in crossing routes or in posts. I would think that is one area where we can create favorable matchups (as Ed Cunningham pointed out, the TE route opened up the path for Gonzo’s TD).


The line was inconsistent. Perhaps their best run blocking effort of the year, but they also had some brutal collapses periodically. Beekman struggled. Poles had some ole’s. Avenski played well. Marten and Cherilus both looked good. Most of our running success was off tackle.


The play calling was not very good. I can’t figure Bible out. The scoring drives were great. But he’d screw up these other drives with all sorts of random stuff (the option?) or with plays that Ryan has struggled with. Also, and this is where I sound like I am never happy, but what is with the bomb to Gonzo that turned into an INT? Yes it was a bad pass, but he doesn’t have the speed to breakaway on something like that. And I don’t know if that is the type of play we need right there. We are moving the ball. The offense is clicking, why go high risk right then? The return of the deep ball has been an added bonus this year, but I would still like to see it used wisely. The other thing that drove me nuts about TOB/Bible’s call – the two point conversion. One, how can you not have the right people out there? Don’t you practice that all year? Two, we are running the ball very well at that point, why not go First and Toal or maybe even a draw with AC. Obviously the miss attempted proved costly.


Defense: C-


Before I get into the units, let me say the tackling was atrocious. The usual culprits like Anam had plenty of misses, but guys like Razzie Smith, Brady Smith, Anderson, Albright, Pruitt, Dunbar and Morris all had their share of whiffs.


Defensive line was another letdown. I am so disappointed in B.J. Raji. NC State showed us the type of havoc a big, quick DT can do. Raji can play at the same level Tank Tyler. Tyler lost All-American teammates. Tyler is the focal point of blocking schemes, yet he still made a difference. Raji did not. The other guys played hard, but the only time Giles and Larkin made tackles were when Akins forced Evans in their direction. Willis was quiet.


Akins was the MVP. With him as the quasi-DE/rushing LB, we were able to generate a pass rush. Evans was flustered most of the night and didn’t convert a 3rd down until late in the game. Dunbar was solid. Pruitt was pretty good. Toal and Fracois were quiet. McLaughlin looked good in his time out there.


The secondary was a mixed bag. Some great plays – especially Davis breaking up a huge play, and Tribble made a great grab late (that should have won the game). Then there were some awful tackles: Smith, Anam, Morris, Anderson. And horrendous coverage. We let their guys get out of bounds. We let their guys out jump us. We let them break tackles. Breaking up anyone of those big plays would’ve won the game.


The poor tackling is on Spaz. It is a hallmark of his defense and there is no excuse for it at this point in his tenure. He called a pretty good game until the final drive. I thought we should have blitzed more throughout the game. Any time Evans had pressure he rushed his throws. So what do we do with the game on the line? Leave him alone and allow him to move the ball on our soft zone. Terrible. Cowardly.


Special Teams: D+


Ayers had a great game and is continuing a strong season. He also bailed out Geiser on two high snaps.


The punt coverage and kick coverage was pretty good, with the exception of Anam’s boneheaded play.


Smith had one nice return and wasn’t much of a factor beyond that.


So why the low grade? Because it is unacceptable to have a kicker that can’t make an extra point. TOB has been sending Ohliger out there for three years. At what point does he learn or make some sort of change. He says things like “Jerry Petercuskie is working with him.” Well let me ask: “how’s that working for you?” This is beyond sad at this point. But the buck stops with TOB. What amazes me about his consistent special teams ineptness, is that for years he’s watched Frank Beamer change games with good special teams, yet never once thought to emulate that. Stubborn and stupid.


Overall: D


The team probably deserves a C, but the coaching brings it down. What a shame. We outplayed them but still lost. This is how Clemson and BYU must have felt.

Saturday, September 23, 2006

WTF? 2006

Terrible, terrible, tough loss. Bad QB play. Bad special teams. Questionable play calls. We just let a first-time starter drive the field with less than a minute left.


Well there goes our special year. Our chance at the conference title just took a huge blow. TOB doesn't extend his win streak to 7. BC doesn't get off to its best start under TOB.


As I've said all week, playing these close games will cost you. Good teams put a team like NC State away.

The Athletic Department and some of the "all is well" folks wonder why people dislike and even hate TOB so much. This type of game is the reason. I've spent all summer wondering if he could ever break through. He can't. We will not win 10 regular games. We will not get to the ACC Championship game. We will waste the easiest schedule in BC history. We are looking at another 9 win season and a December Bowl that no one cares about.

I won't have my grades up until Monday morning. Go to AOL to reread the live blog if you enjoy pain.

Live Blogging over at AOL

Check it out here.

Friday, September 22, 2006

Weekend plans

This weekend we are moving. We're staying in Atlanta, but upgraded to a bigger house with more space for Mrs. ATL_eagle and Baby ATL_eagle. Perfect weekend for a night game. However, Sunday will be really busy and I probably won't have time to watch the game twice before I post my Grade Report Sunday night/Monday morning. So to make it up to anyone interested, I've decided to live blog for the first time. I've avoided live blogging in the past because I like to watch the game as a fan first. But this weekend is as good a time to try it as any. Check it out over on AOL.


Now wish my laptop luck. If the game is anything like our first three, there is a very good chance the laptop could get thrown out a window.

Tackling tackling

Not a whole lot of news this week. This article from Thursday's Herald did get my attention. The article at one point says "The Eagles may be failing at some of the basics, like tackling, because they are young on the defensive side." I don't know if that is the writer, Steve Conroy's thoughts, or if he is listing a criticism he has heard from players and coaches. Regardless of the source of the analysis, tackling, unfortunately, is not the problem.


BC hasn't been a great tackling team for a few years. Henderson and Toal ole'd a bunch of tackles last year. If anything, aside from the numerous blown plays on Spiller's great run in the Clemson game, the tackling has been improved. Tribble is doing a much better job at bringing his men down. Pruitt and Francois are very good at wrapping people up. The only real bad form tacklers who regularly see the field are Anam and Silva. And Silva is brutal head hunter who doesn't let many guys get buy him. The real problem has been scheme and speed. Our schemes have played to the other team's strengths and we are not getting to the ball carriers and QB fast enough. We are just not getting to the guys or getting to the right zone/hole/assignment fast enough.

So good news: tackling has improved. Bad news: we aren't getting close enough to tackle.

Thursday, September 21, 2006

BC-NC State preview

A reeling team vs. one of the luckiest hottest in the country. No contest, right? C’mon. This is BC we are talking about. Even our scrimmages are close. Here are my thoughts on the Wolfpack.


Theme that won’t be discussed on television. Pressure on Amato will be discussed. TOB the great leader and winningest coach at BC will be discussed. What won’t be discussed is how similar their accomplishments are. Perception does not always equal reality. TOB wins more than he loses, wins bowls and is an unassuming guy at a program that is not flashy. Amato wins more than he loses, wins bowls but is an attention magnet with his stupid glasses, funny voice and even funnier quotes. Chuck announced his big time intentions for NC State long ago and every little misstep brings out the vultures. Now let me set the record straight -- I don’t think much of Amato as a coach. I would much rather have TOB than him, but their accomplishments are comparable and Chuck has done many things that TOB critics have been waiting for (won a Jan 1. Bowl, won 10 games and beaten a team like FSU three times).


TOB’s winning percentage .621
Amato’s winning percentage .610


Three simple keys
1. BC needs a big day from B.J. Raji. He has been inconsistent so far this season. The rest of the line is trying their best but he is the only true game changer up front. In order to keep pressure off their new QB and keep BC’s offense off the field, NC State will probably lean on the run. The key to slowing it down will be Raji. He was very good against the run last year. Not only did he collapse the line, but he was a good tackler and followed the action. We need to see the 2005 Raji on Saturday.
2. BC needs to establish the run early. In the last two games BC was able to use the run in the second half after sputtering in the first half. NC State just allowed 291 rushing yards to Southern Miss. There is no reason BC cannot at least get 180 on the ground against the Wolfpack’s young line.
3. BC needs to show Evans multiple looks. It is easy to say that Spaz uses the same defense and never blitzes. The reality is that he mixes in a fair amount of blitzes and pressure from the base defense. Now let’s mix in more or go more 3 down line man with Akins blitzing from the slot. Or have 3 down line man and drop Akins in to coverage. Whatever he can think of...the point is Evans should come up to the line and wonder “what they heck are they going to do to me now?”


Gambling Notes
-- TOB 12-11 as an away favorite
-- TOB is 8-4 as an away favorite against a conference opponent
-- Amato is 13-13 off a loss
The current line is BC -7



What would be a pleasant surprise? At this point any win in regulation! Actually I’ll be surprised if BC wins this with ease. NC State is a disaster right now but those types of teams have often sprung back to life against us.


What would be a letdown? Losing. BC controls its destiny. Losing a to struggling conference team in a season where the divisional title is within reach would be a major letdown.


What would be a shocker? Another OT win. First, half of our fan base won’t survive the stress. But I just don’t want to keep tempting fate. As I said Sunday, our luck will run out.


Bottom Line
BC needs a really good effort and win. Another narrow win will leave everyone wondering how good BC really is. NC State is bordering on full meltdown. BC needs to show killer instinct. Don’t give this opponent the glimmer of hope they are looking for.
Final Score: BC 35, NC State16

Wednesday, September 20, 2006

AOL update on Amato and the media

TOB has whiners. Chuck has an angry press core.

Guest Blogger: Section Six Returns

NC State blogger Steven from Section Six is back to explain their disastrous start and what BC can expect this weekend. Go to Section Six to read more about the Wolfpack.


1. Are things as bad as they seem?

Yeah, pretty much. The biggest concerns coming into the season--Marcus Stone and the defense--have been as bad as feared. It doesn't look like the game has slowed down for Stone, and the defense was exposed by Southern Mississippi, of all teams. The way things are going right now, I can't imagine this team winning enough games to become bowl eligible.

And then there is the off-field crap: the backlash from Amato's comments about Akron's partial qualifiers, all the job speculation, etc. I'm trying not to freak out...but it's ugly.


2. Do you expect the QB change to make a difference?


No, but I would never be mistaken for an optimist. Daniel Evans did look good in garbage time against USM, and I thought the interception he threw was more of a good play by the defender than a poor decision on his part. At one point, USM was blitzing and Evans's protection broke down quickly, forcing him to make a fast decision. He completed the throw, and I remember thinking there was no way Marcus Stone would've made that play. So although Evans was pretty much ignored coming out of high school, there are at least a few indications that he can be a starter at this level.


Even if he comes out and plays well against Boston College, I think NC State has too many problems in too many other places to beat the Eagles. I wouldn't be worried about the backup-QB-sparks-the-team factor if I were Boston College, but you never know...

3. What are the keys to beating NC State?


Don't let us run the ball. Were Marcus Stone starting, I would say that this is all there is to it. Daniel Evans probably will not be much more of a passing threat than Stone, but I do think Evans makes the BC defense's job a little more complicated--if
only because Evans is an unknown quantity.


We tend to make plenty of mistakes, be they penalties or turnovers, and if Boston College is sufficiently opportunistic, it will win the game.


4. What's your prediction?

After the Southern Miss game, I am dreading BC's offense. USM moved the ball at will; the running backs had big holes and receivers were open everywhere. I'm especially worried about the BC passing game because it has been so effective this
season. NC State may be without its best cornerback again, but even with him in the fold, I'm not sure the Pack has an answer for Matt Ryan.


I could see us hangin' in if we win the turnover battle and Danny Evans plays better than expected. But how likely is that? BC wins, 34-17.

Tuesday, September 19, 2006

AOL update on the poll miscue

Click here to read it. I really don't think the polls mean much at this point.

Lucky Number Seven

When putting together my predictions for the season and thinking about strong starts, one little factoid kept gnawing at me -- TOB’s not streaky. After a few losses he usually rights the ship. And he never seems to string together a bunch of wins.


Saturday BC has the chance to notch its seven-straight win -- a new record under TOB. This is the second time he has won six in a row. How does his streak of 6 compare to his peers? Here are the best streaks of ACC coaches at their respective ACC schools:

TOB -- 6 wins

Chuck Amato -- 9 wins
Frank Beamer -- 13 wins
Bobby Bowden -- 17 wins
Tommy Bowden -- 8 wins
John Bunting -- 5 wins
Larry Coker -- 24 wins
Ralph Friedgen -- 8 wins
Chan Gailey -- 4 wins
Jim Grobe -- 3 wins
Al Groh -- 8 wins
Ted Roof -- no consecutive wins


With the way the season is playing out TOB should extend his streak beyond 7 to 8 wins. We will be favored in both games. But with the way things have started, I don't think I should take anything for granted.

Monday, September 18, 2006

Blogpoll Week 3

Below is my ballot. I moved up BC, but still think the team is costing by.


Games I watched
BYU-BC 100% (twice)
Michigan-Notre Dame 25%
Oklahoma-Oregon 25%
LSU-Auburn 20%
Miami-Louisville 20%
WVU-Maryland 20%
Florida-UT 20%
Clemson-FSU 50%
Army-Texas A&M 30%



RankTeamDelta
1 Auburn 1
2 Ohio State 1
3 Southern Cal 1
4 Florida 1
5 West Virginia 3
6 Michigan 5
7 Virginia Tech --
8 Georgia 1
9 Louisville 4
10 Iowa 2
11 Louisiana State 5
12 Oregon 4
13 Texas 2
14 TCU 4
15 Boston College 2
16 Notre Dame 15
17 Clemson 9
18 Florida State 8
19 Arizona State 6
20 Oklahoma 1
21 Rutgers 3
22 UCLA 1
23 Michigan State 3
24 Wisconsin 2
25 Nebraska 5

Dropped Out: Tennessee (#14), Miami (Florida) (#21), Alabama (#22).