[First a little bit of an explanation. Through the entire history of the blog, watching BC Football live and then rewatching it was not an issue or a challenge. Even as I had children, their activities tended to be more morning-based. Now increasingly my Saturday afternoons are spent watching (and coaching) their games and following BC on my phone or in the car. My Sundays in the fall are very busy too with volunteer work, leaving even less time to rewatch. I think rewatching is very valuable as a fan and blogger, so I plan to keep it up. However, I don't know if I can plan to regularly pump it out by Sunday night. Thanks for your continued support.]
For as dominant as an offensive performance as that was, the game was far, far from clean and did leave me with concerns. Beyond the Special Teams miscues, the OLine and DLine were not as consistent as they will need to be against elite competition. The conditioning issue -- which was mentioned on the broadcast multiple times -- also should have us and Addazio worried. Given the talent advantage and explosive plays, it never should have been that close. Watching it a second time only confirmed that belief.
Offense: A-
Brown looked even better than he did against UMass and Holy Cross. His deep throws weren't perfect but they were still pretty close. He didn't force things. He also was a little more accurate on his short passes. I would still like to see him running more but depends on his knee.
Dillon ran well. He didn't do anything to top some of his previous highlights, but his runs were solid and explosive. I would like to see him more in the passing game. Levy only got a few snaps.
I know a lot of guys are winning awards this week, but Jeff Smith might be most deserving. His hands have gotten so much better. He runs really well and his speed is impressive. If he stays healthy and teams keep leaving him open, he will have a huge season. White had a nice TD, as did Glines. Sweeney made a great adjustment on his TD. We didn't get the TEs more involved, but probably should have. There were lots of plays available.
The OLine was the most troubling spot. I know it is tough when the opponent sells out to stop the run, but that wasn't the main problem. In straight up powers, the oline looked good. When they had to move -- stretches, traps, counters, -- things broke down a bit. The counter seems to be the best play. The power sweep would seem to be a good idea but it was never very clean during the game. Monteiro seemed to struggle the most when moving or pulling. Schmaal was good. Petrula did a good job with the edge. If teams are going to keep challenging the OLine, they need to be ready for speedy penetration.
My only critique of the Offensive gameplan was too much variety in the run game. We tried a bit of everything and it was hit or miss. I think keeping things simple, especially when you have someone like Dillon, is the best plan. All he needs is one missed tackle and he can score. Loefler needs to focus on what BC does best in the running game and stop messing around with stuff the Oline can't pull off yet.
Defense: B-
Ray had a great game. He still was aggressive late in the game. Allen wasn't as dominant. He was fine. The DTs really struggled. I am not sure how much they were told to hold position against Wake's run game, but they were getting pushed back over and over. Smith got pushed back. Karafa was a step slow. Valdez and Rayam got playing time but didn't disrupt much.
Strachan was pretty active, but also had a few misses. Richardson also got lots of playing time and was ok.
The DBs were the best part of the D. Cheevers took some gambles, but also made plenty of plays. Harris played well. Denis was fine. Sebastian got beat a few times. Torres was good.
I am surprised we still haven't figured Wake out on D. Their approach under Clawson hasn't really changed. But they got lots of push and lots of plays off. We couldn't get them off the field. That's a bad sign. Why not bring more pressure? Or do something to help out the DTs.
Special Teams: B-
Even without the fumble or blocked punt there were still some other Special Teams issues. We missed an extra point. We got lucky on a penalty on one of Wake's long returns.
Overall: B
As Addazio pointed out in the post-game press conference, this team did persevere for the win. Overcoming mistakes and the shifting game times could easily have been a distraction. He deserves credit for that and for building such a talent advantage. But I think having two easy games to start the season was somewhat unnecessary and may have led to the tiredness and sloppy play.
In a way, it was ideal for Addazio in that he got the win, the team showed flashes of greatness, yet he can still keep them humble.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
17 comments:
B- for special teams?!?
Now THAT'S grade inflation!
Agree about the two opening games - they did little to nothing for us. I'd rather risk losing an opening game against a competitive opponent and learn something from it that will impact the rest of the season than getting an automatic W to pad the coach's resume.
I think that Addazio mismanaged the HC game, pulling the starters too early. OK, pull Dillon, as he is a proven commodity. But Brown, the oline, etc... needed the ingame experience to come together going forward, and they missed that opportunity. I think it showed conditioning wise and in cohesiveness.And Brown hasn't played half a season yet.
Can anyone explain why when Republican presidents are in office BC football excels? Reagan produced Flutie the best player in the country and a #4 ranking. W Bush produced Matt Ryan the best player in the country, even though they gave the Heisman to two stiffs named Tebow and Troy Smith and the #10 ranking. And now Trump has produced Dillon the best player in the country 2. Are Brown and Dillon the best QB-RB combo in the country? The best play of the game was the pass to Giles for the last TD. A perfect throw on third and nine in a one score game. Borgeson made a great tackle on a Dortch return.HAPPY DAYS ARE HERE AGAIN.
ATL -- thanks for keeping up the game recaps. Those of us with older/grown kids know weekends are not time off. Perhaps pick and choose your games if needed or if something notable happens (or doesn't) recap those. I think everyone here will understand if you don't grade our performance against Temple if it is a blow out.
That said, you are smoking crack with the special teams grade. That has Daz Apologist written all over it. I want my money back. :)
Would love if you brought back the post game periscopes for the games you are able to watch live
Have to step it up against Purdue. Two special teams miscues will not bode well on the road against a hungry team like Purdue. I have all the faith in our corners, but our LB's need to be on their A game with their pass defense.
Anyone looking for more BC content, check out The Perch podcast with Scott Mutryn. Weekly podcast and very well done.
Purdue scares me. Their games have been extremely close, and they are pretty mad and hungry about now. Our special teams play is awful and will come back to bite us unless it gets straightened out soon. I'll be watching the Purdue game very nervously.
Ned, Priceless comment.
And when Frank Leahy was coach the President was ............
Need to play three DL with another LB or DB against passing teams.
FDR was a good president in the 40s too.
When Tom Coughlin was Coach President
Post a Comment